It doesn't prevent Arizona from winning it all, on the 25th anniversary of Lute Olson's championship squad in 1997. That helps the Big Ten look at itself in the mirror. Purdue has been in the top 10 all season with a typically big front line and all-Big Ten guard Jaden Ivey. Iowa has been a resilient scoring force all season and his under-seeded at a No. The Boilers and Hawkeyes would be making their first Final Four appearance since 1980. I like Purdue and Iowa to get to New Orleans. Here we go again with six of the nine Big Ten squads higher seeded in their first games. Ohio State was knocked off by Oral Roberts. That despite the entire tournament being played one of the conference's capitals, Indianapolis. The Big Ten didn't last year despite having nine teams in as well. With that many teams comes big-time pressure to make a dent. Nine teams - 64 percent of the league and 13 percent of the bracket – populate the NCAA Tournament. Bulldogs script a terrific college sports redemption story after falling one game short a year ago. GU has the offensive and defensive ceiling to get there, and it’s experience, length and improved athleticism wind up being enough. There have been great Gonzaga teams - even some better than this one. Mark Few finally gets it done and makes history. Kansas to the title game is more of a value play, plus KU has a top-five guy in Ochai Agbaji. Gonzaga’s my pick to win the national championship because the 7-1 Holmgren paired with Timme is the best 1-2 in college hoops. Gonzaga rates as the best team in the sport, so I’ll go with the 1-2 of Drew Timme and Chet Holmgren to get it done, then I’m sticking with my preseason national title pick, Purdue, to come out of what I expect will be a noisy and entertaining East region. On the left side of the bracket, a Gonzaga-Duke regional final in San Francisco would be phenomenal. I’ll stick with that and go with Big Ten co-champs of the regular season Illinois, which is one of the best 4-seeds in recent memory. I’ve maintained the entire season that teams as low as the 4-line are good enough to make it to New Orleans. (Both mid-majors obviously can never get in-state big brother to schedule them.) As for my Final Four: Kansas has the easiest path by far. I’ll ride the hot hand, and yes, that means Murray State gets to play and beat Kentucky in the second round, a la Loyola Chicago doing the same thing to Illinois a year ago. But those two teams have won a combined 58-7 and have won 41 of their past 42 games. And here I am putting Murray State into the second weekend and giving Vermont a huge win over Arkansas. A beautiful bracket of 68 teams with near-infinite possibilities. And it’s simple to use.Where will we see chaos this year? It’s inevitable, you know. Today, the sophistication of our NCAA Bracket Picks product generates customized brackets that are up to 10 times as likely to win pools compared to the average competitor. NCAA Bracketology: Projecting the 2023 March Madness men's field The Cavaliers and Red Raiders, who met for the 2019 national championship, are trending up in ESPN's latest 2023 bracket projection. We’ve used data, technology, and math to build the new cutting edge in bracket picking. To reach that level of confidence, you have to run millions of tests of potential bracket pick combinations, simulated in pools that look like yours. What remains incredibly difficult, though, is translating that general knowledge into 67 specific picks that give you the best possible chance to win your specific pool - and having hard data that demonstrates why those picks give you the maximum edge. With the data available today, it’s not super difficult to identify the tournament teams being overrated or underrated by the general public. The good news is that although the scope of computation going on behind the scenes to optimize picks for your pool is massive, you get a very simple output: ready-to-play brackets, delivered in seconds.Īs time passes, more and more people are becoming familiar with the general principles of smart, value-driven bracket picking. ![]() In the first pool, picking a "15 seed over a 2 seed" upset in the first round may be a smart gamble in the second pool, almost certainly not. Rather, they exhaustively optimize every pick in the bracket, evaluating interdependencies and ensuring that the overall risk level of the picks is best aligned to your pool’s size and scoring system - including dynamics like upset bonuses.įor example, if you’re competing against 10,000 people in a pool with big upset bonuses, the optimal bracket recommended by our system is going to look different than the optimal bracket for a 15-person pool with no upset bonus. These computer simulations, and the related algorithms we’ve built, don’t just identify a list of the most underrated champion picks or promising upset picks for you to consider. ![]() Ready-To-Play Brackets, Customized For Your Pools
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |